Re: f15 2.6.39 rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

2011/6/30 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> I've just pushed a f15-2.6.39 branch which contains a work in progress rebase.
> The only thing that I'm really concerned about in this right now is X regressions.
> We had a drm-next backport to .38 and moving that to .39 turned up a ton of rejects.
> I fixed up a few by hand, but the resulting compile failures made my head hurt, so
> I've mostly left them disabled.  If the nouveau/intel drm dudes could look over
> that branch and fix up whatever is necessary, we can look at getting this out
> to people soon.
>
> (looking ahead, after its release pushing 3.0.x as 2.6.40 is probably going to
>  happen,

I ask out of curiosity - why 2.6.40? Is it a big problem to run 3.0 on F15?

> in a shorter timeframe than what took us to get .39 ready)
>
>        Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> kernel mailing list
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
>



-- 
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux