Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/20, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>
> I don't really have an objection
> to utrace per se, as it is low impact, just the idea of reverting a
> bunch of inconvenient code to do it.

I understand. Once again, it was supposed to be a temporary solution
until fedora switches to 3.1. And the reverted code does not make the
real difference so far, the user-visible changes are minor.

OK, I won't argue. So we need to rework utrace/ptrace in 3.0, then we
should do this again in 3.1. I'll try to do something.

Oleg.

_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux