>>> My test case was to simply add CONFIG_VIDEO_VIA_CAMERA=y to my >>> config-local, as I know its disabled in the stock config, because it >>> doesn't build (due to a dependency on updated viafb bits in 2.6.37). I >>> created a source rpm with that modified config-local, then did an >>> rpmbuild, and it failed on drivers/media/video/via-camera.c exactly like >>> I'd expected it to. So I suspect you've either done something wrong with >>> your implementation or you execution. :) >>> >> Yet another kernel build error: >> >> drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-vbi.c:49: error: implicit >> declaration of function 'in_interrupt' >> make[4]: *** [drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-vbi.o] Error 1 >> make[3]: *** [drivers/media/video/em28xx] Error 2 >> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> make[2]: *** [drivers/media/video] Error 2 >> make[1]: *** [drivers/media] Error 2 >> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> make: *** [drivers] Error 2 >> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> + exit 1 >> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Di6kj9 (%build) >> > The driver you have enabled has the following dependencies: > > VIAFB camera controller support (VIDEO_VIA_CAMERA) > > CONFIG_VIDEO_VIA_CAMERA: > Maybe so, but we already know that VIA_CAMERA won't compile (see my first post on this thread), so we are back to square one on this. I may as well forget that kernel .35 exists - if nobody from Fedora seems bothered about the problems raised by (mainly) me and you or expect us to fix it for them then they are solely mistaken! _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
