On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:50:25AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On 10/27/2010 11:02 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > > Not that I feel like arguing to save dangling symlink, what happens in the > > case when you install kernel-devel-$KERNVER but there is no > > kernel-$KERNVER installed to match? Does the rpm fail because > > /lib/modules/$KERNVER doesn't exist? Or are we going to add a dependency > > to prevent that from happening? > > I think that in this situation, it is permissable for both kernel and > kernel-devel to own /lib/modules/$KERNVER. I'd rather have that > duplicate directory ownership than a dangling symlink, and the Packaging > Guidelines permit it. I didn't realize rpm would allow it. Let's try it then and see who screams. :-) Cheers, Don _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
