On 10/27/2010 11:02 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > Not that I feel like arguing to save dangling symlink, what happens in the > case when you install kernel-devel-$KERNVER but there is no > kernel-$KERNVER installed to match? Does the rpm fail because > /lib/modules/$KERNVER doesn't exist? Or are we going to add a dependency > to prevent that from happening? I think that in this situation, it is permissable for both kernel and kernel-devel to own /lib/modules/$KERNVER. I'd rather have that duplicate directory ownership than a dangling symlink, and the Packaging Guidelines permit it. ~spot _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel