Re: spec cleanup.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:46:54PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
 > Dave Jones (davej@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
 > > - kdump is kind of a disaster, it's never worked in fedora afair.
 > >   jarod was poking at it from a rhel context, but I doubt he has the time to maintain
 > >   it fulltime in fedora.  lets just drop it all ?
 > ...
 > > - there's no more mkinitrd in f14, so dracut or gtfo ?
 > 
 > Actually, why can't/shouldn't the kdump stuff use dracut?

The with_kdump stuff we have in the spec now doesn't do anything at all afaict.
It hasn't since we stopped building ppc64-kdump.

The mechanism for how kdump works is unrelated, this is all just cruft for
building a special kernel from when it wasn't relocatable.  The only arch
that still has that affliction is s390 apparently, and well.. fedora-s390? really?

	Dave
 
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux