> Right, yes. To that end, would you recommend a specific mailing list > other than lkml to start on for just the x86 folks, or is lkml really the > best bet for that? Just the usual rules as per MAINTAINERS: To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> CC: x86@xxxxxxxxxx, lkml CC: roland@xxxxxxxxxx, kmcmartin@xxxxxxxxxx > Yeah, I'm all for that; I just think upstreaming this is going to take > longer than either of our next release cycles. :) Yeah, well, it's taken us several cycles to get around to bothering to try. At any rate, IMHO a series/branch of patches proposed upstream is the thing we'll want to share. Even if it's not all (or any) merged upstream soon (or ever), that process will yield cleaned-up and granular patches that are better to maintain (and to share across distros) as well as being better to merge if the NAKers relent. Thanks, Roland _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
