On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 01:59:14PM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > Oliver Falk wrote: >> Dave Jones wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: >>> > Oliver Falk wrote: >>> > > Hi! >>> > > > > Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-( >>> > > And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it? >>> > > > > Kyle McMartin wrote: >>> > > [ ... ] >>> > >> This all looks fine to me. >>> > > > > May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-) >>> > > > > > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly >>> > >> new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on >>> stuff, and >>> > >> not just someone asking for random commit access. >>> > > > > Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you >>> where > > worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react >>> differently. >>> > > > >> I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace >>> for patches, >>> > >> I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts? >>> > > > > Whatever you prefer. >>> > > > > Let me know, so I start working on this today... >>> > > Did I miss the answer to my mail!? >>> >>> Sorry, I was on vacation, and it fell off my radar when I got back. >>> Looked ok to commit to me though iirc. >>> >>> I've no really preference on patch naming. If you want to do alpha-*, >>> go ahead. >>> but don't feel that you have to. >> >> OK. I'll commit the changes in a clean way, add CL, etc. >> >> We can still move the patches and use other names. Or any other change >> that might be necessary... > > I've clean up my changes and finally commited them (F-9 only). Plz have > a look at it and if it's fine for you, I go on with F-10. Looks like you committed them to CVS HEAD. The F-9 kernels are being built from a CVS branch (which is how they are still on 2.6.27). Is that what you intended? josh _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
