Oliver Falk wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
> Oliver Falk wrote:
> > Hi!
> > > > Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-(
> > And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it?
> > > > Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >> This all looks fine to me.
> > > > May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-)
> > > > > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly
> >> new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on
stuff, and
> >> not just someone asking for random commit access.
> > > > Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you
where > > worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react
differently.
> > > >> I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace
for patches,
> >> I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts?
> > > > Whatever you prefer.
> > > > Let me know, so I start working on this today...
> > Did I miss the answer to my mail!?
Sorry, I was on vacation, and it fell off my radar when I got back.
Looked ok to commit to me though iirc.
I've no really preference on patch naming. If you want to do alpha-*,
go ahead.
but don't feel that you have to.
OK. I'll commit the changes in a clean way, add CL, etc.
We can still move the patches and use other names. Or any other change
that might be necessary...
I've clean up my changes and finally commited them (F-9 only). Plz have
a look at it and if it's fine for you, I go on with F-10.
Best,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
