On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 10:33 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jon Masters (jcm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Which means that third parties will end up getting into the kernel > > rebuilding business if their modules are unloadable. Suddenly you have > > users running many different builds of the same Fedora kernel, and > > asking for help on mailing lists, and all of that goodness. > > Really? Do you have actual stats for the number (percentage) of Fedora > users that *actually* need to update their modules (as opposed to following > some blindly ridiculous message-board advice...) Nope. I'm just taking the viewpoint that users shouldn't be artificially restricted from doing so. I know this isn't the case right now, and the proposed modules being built-in are fairly harmless, but I'm raising this now before users can't build their own graphics drivers or whatever else they would like to add to their system, based on choice. Jon. _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
