Re: de-modularising for the win!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jon Masters (jcm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Which means that third parties will end up getting into the kernel
> rebuilding business if their modules are unloadable. Suddenly you have
> users running many different builds of the same Fedora kernel, and
> asking for help on mailing lists, and all of that goodness.

Really? Do you have actual stats for the number (percentage) of Fedora
users that *actually* need to update their modules (as opposed to following
some blindly ridiculous message-board advice...)

Bill

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux