Re: revisit: turning some of the "always used" modules to built-in

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is likely a difference between what should be built-in in Fedora
vs what should be in RHEL.  For RHEL, I really like the flexibility
that having something be modular allows.  I have, on many occasions,
needed to replace modules using DKMS, including libata, sd_mod,
scsi_mod, ahci, etc.  Basically anything that touches hardware
directly or one layer up.  Not often, but enough that I like
modularity for this possibility.  It has meant the difference between
being able to ship hardware, or not for another 6 months until new CDs
are spun...

-- 
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux