On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 07:00:57AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Well, I'd really like to see a combination of dkms and kmod's, so > ordinary users can get pre-compiled modules as kmods (or another > packaging standard for pre-compiled kernel-modules) and other can use > dkms if they want (or it could jump in in cases where the pre-compiled > packages are not yet available). > > Just relying on dkms sounds crazy in my eyes. > > BTW, the real solution for the bug which is mentioned in the subject of > this mail would be to dkms put the modules in a rpm that depends on the > kernel. Then it would be removed fine on kernel-uninstall. The modules built by dkms aren't included on a package because they are built on demand on the user machine. Or do you suggest that DKMS generate and install a RPM package when new modules are compiled? -- Eduardo
Attachment:
pgpOztA4NR67A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
