Re: Bugzilla Bug 250377: External modules of removed kernels are not removed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 17:25 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Is there a reason to add a hack to the kernel %post in particular,
> > instead of just making people use rpm triggers?  I mean, horror and all that.
> > But at least it's generic SEP horror, and not new hair for the kernel rpm
> > itself (i.e. our problem).
> 
> On the surface, I don't see why the couldn't. I suppose we should prod
> Matt Domsch on why he's against using triggers for dkms, since his
> objection in the bug doesn't list any details...

Triggers run at not exactly the time you expect them to.  Which makes
them a little bit less helpful.  Really, you want to plug-in after
depmod, etc are run but before the initrd is made.  And you can't do
that from a trigger.

Also, triggers manage to cause all sorts of crazy fun weird corner
cases.  Fear them. :-)

Jeremy

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux