On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:44:11AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > On 11.07.2007 02:53, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:07:05AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > [...] > > actually x86-64 tickless has been in rawhide about 2 weeks, and is now > > in this rebase for FC6/F7. Whether we roll with it for a proper update > > depends on how it fares during it's trial in updates-testing. > > So far the forced-hpet part was the only bit that's caused trouble > > afaics, so with that disabled, it should be (hopefully) boring. > > Well, for me and dragoran it's still causing trouble *afaics*; look > closer at > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247346 > > Problems start to appear when the hpet stuff for x86_64 went it, and did > not vanish when you disabled the forced-hpet for some of the recent > ICH's from Intel (which afaics [would need the lspci data to be sure] > are in both our machines). > > /me will later update the bug with the lspci output when I'm in front of > my laptop again. Yeah, I'm picking over that bug now. Will try and find a box I can reproduce this on tomorrow. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
