On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 23:39 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 10:12 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > If it's good enough for Fedora to ship and support, we can put it in the > > > main kernel package. Besides; if it's good enough for Fedora to ship and > > > > Which is something I suggested later in this thread. > > > > > And if it isn't good enough for upstream to ship and support, why in > > > $DEITY's name would we want to ship it, again? > > > > *cough* squashfs *cough cough* wireless-dev *cough* CFS *cough hack* xen > > *cough* > > And a bunch of drivers too. I remember the USB DSL drivers around FC4 > timeframe, because the complexity of setting that crap up in FC3 > offended me so much. PlayStation 3 support in F7. There's _plenty_ of > stuff we've shipped in our main kernel package because it's _almost_ > upstream and it's (almost) good enough. There's no need to package them > separately¹ -- either we're willing to ship and support them, or we > aren't. > > > Ok, out of those really only squashfs and xen aren't immediately headed > > towards some kind of upstream inclusion. > > Is squashfs not headed upstream? Obviously Xen was and is a massive I think it's been tried twice now. The first time, there were legitimate review issues. The second time was mostly people whining about pointless crap. I think Philip lost interest after that. josh _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
