Re: F7 redux, and the road to F8.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:50:50PM +0200, dragoran wrote:

 > this would mean that we will might end up having cfs as the scheduler 
 > and tickless  x86_64.
 > I mostly using x86_64 ... where there any major problems (exept the dell 
 > one) related to tickless kernels in the F7 cycle?

Too early to say really. There were a number of oddball bugs
that still aren't really understood that could be related,
but on the whole it hasn't been /that/ bad considering the
amount of code that changed.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux