Re: F7 redux, and the road to F8.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/07/2007 03:39 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
>> Xen.
>> ~~~~
>> This might get interesting to watch for F8 if XenU gets upstream
>> (Which akpm seems to suggest it might).  Given we've decoupled
>> kernel/kernel-xen, we might want to just disable the upstream variant
>> until F9, and wait until we have both the dom0 and the domU stuff
>> coming from the same pieces.  Will need more discussion with
>> the virtualisation team when that lands in Linus' tree.
> 
> As it's decoupled, exactly how much pain are we running into with
> various fixes (PATA/SATA, suspend, etc., etc.) not being consistent?
> 

Xen is on kernel 2.6.20, which means they need to track the FC6
updates. Apparently they're not -- AFAICT from a quick look at CVS,
they shipped kernel 2.6.20.3, while current FC6 is 2.6.20.11 plus
additional patches.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux