On 2018-09-13 23:45, Rex Dieter wrote:
Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 9:34 AM Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:27:03AM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote:
>> It does not make sense to do it for Frameworks (which is always
>> keeping the API), nor for the bundle known as KDE Applications (where
>> you want the last version), nor for the applications which independent
>> release schedule (Krita, Krusader, Tellico, etc; same as KDE
>> Applications).
>
> One thing that you could do, if you want, is only maintain a single
> branch and spec file for each of these which would build across all
> current supported releases...
Now that part does sound appealing, is essentially what we do for
plasma
releases already by hand.
We could technically do this now simply by ignoring the other branches
and just tell fedpkg to kick off builds against the master branch all
the time.
Oh, if it's just a matter of skipping the merge of branches, then
that's far
less interesting to me. That's not something that would save much time
and
effort.
Best summary for Fedora Modules (and in similar circles, flatpak / snaps
etc) I've heard so far.
--
Steven Haigh
? netwiz@xxxxxxxxx ? http://www.crc.id.au
? +61 (3) 9001 6090 ? 0412 935 897
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list -- kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
