Re: Packaging Kup - naming?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mattia Verga wrote:
> Since Kup is born as a KCM module, I think I can name it "kcm-kup"
> [3]... but there's really no package in Fedora named "kcm". In fact,
> looking through the package list I can find six kcm modules, but they
> are following different name schemas: the oldest three are using the "-"
> separator (kcm-fcitx, kcm-gtk, kcm-qt-graphicssystem), while the newest
> three use the "_" (kcm_systemd, kcm_touchpad, kcm_wacomtablet) which is
> a violation of naming guidelines [4].

It is not. Quoting your link:
| packages where the upstream name naturally contains an underscore are
| excluded from this
which is the case for the KCMs. (kcm_* is their natural name, it is how the 
so files are named, and sometimes also the tarballs, when upstream is not 
bowing to Debian's nonsensical underscore ban.)

The kcm-* naming convention comes from Debian. IMHO, it is incorrect.

Kind regards,
        Kevin
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list -- kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux