Re: Plasma 5.9.3 status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For testing and feedback.  If all goes well, we will seriously consider
bringing plasma-5.9.x to official fedora updates (and will be an upgrade
path from using the plasma-5-unstable copr).

One blocker: a new kf5-kirigami2 dependency needs review,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=kf5-kirigami2

(If more issues come up, I'll create a formal plasma-5.9 tracker bug)

Enjoy, and let us know what breaks.

I just upgraded a few days ago and have been noticing that plasmashell has been using alot of cpu...

 PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND  
2501 gbcox     20   0  0.256t 256412 120092 S 298.3  0.8 671:44.07 plasmashell   

Then I noticed three zombie processes:
ps axo stat,ppid,pid,comm | grep -w defunct
Z     2501 18728 xdg-user-dir <defunct>
Z     2501 18778 xdg-user-dir <defunct>
Z     2501 18829 xdg-user-dir <defunct>

The parent is plasmashell...

If I kill and restart plasmashell, that takes care of the zombies and cpu goes back to normal.

Anyone else see this?

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list -- kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux