On 13/08/16 13:49, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
On Friday 12 August 2016 9:51:33 AM IST Mustafa Muhammad wrote:
I argued above that Qupzilla is just like Chromium and Firefox for the
mission statement, all don't go against it, because there is no
supported KDE browser.
The SIG should provide new users with the best experience possible out
of the box, and most users want Firefox or Chrome, one of the main
reason is trust, another one is extensions.
Some people want to use the browser only for browsing, but most people
want extensions.
By that logic both Windows and Mac should also abandon their Edge and Safari
browser respectively. Both of those operating systems promote and portray best
of their technologies however inadequate they may be. Microsoft can ship Edge.
Mac OS can ship Safari. ChromeOS can ship Chrome. But I am not sure why we are
so adamant about not showcasing best of KDE/Qt technologies.
Suppose that an inexperienced user of an ideologically pure default
browser encounters problems. Will his request for help be answered by
people knowledgeable and experienced in using the same software? Much
of what has appeared here suggests that "dnf install xxxx" would be
offered...
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
