Il 07/08/2016 14:35, Rex Dieter ha scritto:I think many people are casting here their personal preferences instead of focusing on what should be the real point: what's the browser between Firefox, Chromium and Qupzilla that really integrates in KDE and requires the less dependencies being installed over a clean KDE spin installation?In my prior post, I included chromium in the list of browser candidates. If you're not familiar with it, it is essentially a free version of google chrome that recently made it's way into fedora package repositories. Advantages and features include: * based on same rendering engine as qtwebengine (that qupzilla uses) * has active, well-supported upstream * some kde integration: kde file dialogs, kwallet for secrets * supports most chrome addons/extensions Disadvantages include: * pretty new to fedora (only a few weeks) * packaging/buildsystem is... messy and fragile (not unique here, qtwebengine suffers similarly but less so) * not 100% native (like qupzilla) -- Rex _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I think the right choice between them must not force the installation of other requirements but the main QT / KF5 components. Personal considerations about missing functions should not be thrown in the discussion: if someone prefer one browser to another can easily install it over the main installation. Trying to install Qupzilla and Chromium on my workstation (which is *not* a clean KDE installation and I already have Firefox installed, so probably I already have many GTK stuff installed that is required by Chromium), gives me: # dnf install chromium Ultima verifica della scadenza dei metadati: 0:00:54 fa il Wed Aug 10 17:55:35 2016. Dipendenze risolte. ================================================================================ Package Arch Versione Repository Dim. ================================================================================ Installazione in corso: chromium x86_64 52.0.2743.82-9.fc24 updates 37 M chromium-libs x86_64 52.0.2743.82-9.fc24 updates 38 M libcanberra-gtk2 x86_64 0.30-11.fc24 fedora 30 k re2 x86_64 20160401-2.fc24 fedora 174 k u2f-hidraw-policy x86_64 1.0.2-2.fc24 fedora 22 k Riepilogo della transazione ================================================================================ Installati 5 pacchetti Dimensione totale dello scaricamento: 76 M Dimensione installata: 269 M # dnf install qupzilla Ultima verifica della scadenza dei metadati: 0:02:07 fa il Wed Aug 10 17:55:35 2016. Dipendenze risolte. ================================================================================ Package Arch Versione Repository Dim. ================================================================================ Installazione in corso: protobuf x86_64 2.6.1-4.fc24 fedora 356 k qt5-qtwebengine x86_64 5.6.1-3.fc24 updates 28 M qtlockedfile-qt5 x86_64 2.4-21.20150629git5a07df5.fc24 fedora 35 k qtsingleapplication-qt5 x86_64 2.6.1-28.fc24 fedora 43 k qupzilla x86_64 2.0.1-1.fc24 updates 2.5 M re2 x86_64 20160401-2.fc24 fedora 174 k Riepilogo della transazione ================================================================================ Installati 6 pacchetti Dimensione totale dello scaricamento: 31 M Dimensione installata: 105 M Given these outputs I vote for Qupzilla because it does not require GTK stuff and it weights less than a half compared to Chromium (I'm thinking to live images). Mattia |
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
