On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In my prior post, I included chromium in the list of browser candidates. If > you're not familiar with it, it is essentially a free version of google > chrome that recently made it's way into fedora package repositories. > > Advantages and features include: > * based on same rendering engine as qtwebengine (that qupzilla uses) > * has active, well-supported upstream > * some kde integration: kde file dialogs, kwallet for secrets > * supports most chrome addons/extensions > > Disadvantages include: > * pretty new to fedora (only a few weeks) > * packaging/buildsystem is... messy and fragile (not unique here, > qtwebengine suffers similarly but less so) > * not 100% native (like qupzilla) My biggest concern among all the choices is the multimedia support. Fedora cannot ship a full-featured codec stack in any of its spins due to various legal issues. How do the browsers compare for the Fedora user who wants to get more codec support himself? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
