On 07/05/16 22:15, Mark Haney wrote: > > > On 07/05/2016 09:44 AM, Patrick Boutilier wrote: >> On 07/05/2016 10:37 AM, Mark Haney wrote: >>> Is anyone else sick and tired of plasmashell pegging their systems? I >>> swear, I though this was fixed in F23, but it's back in early F24. I >>> love KDE and prefer it over the abortion that is GNOME, but this is just >>> getting stupid. I can't run Chrome, Slack and Thunderbird at the same >>> time without crippling my quad core 3GHZ 12GB RAM laptop. >>> >>> It's a joke. >> >> >> Are you saying your plasmashell process is using 100% or more of %CPU in top? >> > I really hope you're joking. But, if not, top shows plasmashell hitting 80-90% of my > entire system CPU (on a quad core) without fail even after a reboot or shutdown/power > up. This was a problem early in F23 and finally was resolved. Now it's back and NOT > better than ever on the exact same system. I find it ridiculous that this one process > is so jacked up after all the updates it's had in the last 3 years. I love Fedora. I've > been using it and RH since the mid 90s. I detest GNOME with a passion so I have no > desire to use the Workstation version. (And one of the reasons I don't use Ubuntu.) > > Yes, I know there's MATE and Cinnamon, ad nauseam and I like them, but they don't have > the features KDE has. But I'm tempted to just scrap the entire thing if they can't get > their crap together with this. > Maybe he asked the question in that way as he, like myself, isn't seeing any problems with plasamashell taking excessive cpu time. So, I'm not "sick and tired" of anything in that regards. At the moment I don't know what the plan would be to track down what you're seeing on your system. -- You're Welcome Zachary Quinto _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
