Reindl Harald wrote: >> I still think we need at least 2 things to seriously consider holding >> things up: >> >> 1. File a bug (if there is one already, can you give a reference?) > > if i only knew what to write there, it don't work, it breaks my profile, > it's in fact broken for me - other users profiles or a empty profile > won't help me much We need it documented formally, else we cannot consider blocking qt-5.6.x indefinitely. Please file a bug. >> imo, qt-5.6 is the more important piece here, I suppose we could >> do it the way you suggest, but it would also mean resetting *all* of >> KF5 testing: >> * rebuild entire KF5 stack of packages against Qt 5.5.x instead >> * resubmit to bodhi > > too late now - it should had happened in two steps from the very begin > instead throw *two major* updates at the same time in the mix After our kde-sig meeting this morning, this is our tentative plan moving forward. Sometime later this week (or weekend), dvratil will work on rebuilding kf5-5.20 without dependencies on qt-5.6.x, so we can consider pushing that to stable repos first. The result will be that qt-5.6.x will stay in -testing awhile longer (as of now, it's only been 8 days, so another ~week or so is probably not a bad idea). -- Rex _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
