Re: qt-5.6.0 for f22?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 25.03.2016 um 05:14 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Daniel Vrátil wrote:
I'm fine with slowing down on F22. Considering that I'm thinking to also
skip Frameworks and Plasma 5.6 updates for F22, backport only the most
critical issues. Any objections or opinions?

I think Fedora n-1 (currently 22) should be fully supported, i.e., get all
backwards-compatible updates, which Qt 5.6, Plasma 5.6 etc. are supposed to
be.

for sure not

the reason why somebody stays on Fedora n-1 is in the most cases stability and "i can't have something breaking at the moment"

backwards-compatible is one thing, but for a ordinary user which by intention waits as long as possible with dist-upgrades something like the breakage i had on F23 two days ago with KDE is *exactly* what he don't want

Qt/Plasma are not the Kernel where somebody takes case that not much breakage happens

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux