Felix Miata wrote: > Rex Dieter composed on 2016-03-11 13:13 (UTC-0600): > >> I am considering finally EOL'ing kdm in time for fedora 24, anyone still >> interested in keeping it alive? > > I can't be a maintainer, but as it's the only DM I'm aware of that > provides required functionality, I hope it need not be retired before > something provides functionality equivalent to it. OK, I'll bite. What counts as "required functionality" for you? In particular, what's missing from other dm's (sddm in particular)? -- Rex _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
