Re: Systray (was Re: F22 / KDE5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Emilio Recio wrote:
> But the point that I am trying to make is that KF5 should have provided
> for a transitional phase for developers. Both side-by-side.

The whole lifetime of KDE/Plasma 4 was the transitional phase!

But the problem is that the application developers are also dependent on the 
toolkit developers, and there, the GTK+ developers stubbornly refuse to 
natively support the Status Notifier Item (SNI) standard. You can use 
libappindicator, but it is not a drop-in replacement for the GTK+ systray 
classes, and the GTK+ developers don't recommend its use. (There may or may 
not also be other issues with it.) Other non-Qt toolkits also don't support 
SNI, usually because nobody bothered adding support for it.

        Kevin Kofler

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org




[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux