Am 03.08.2015 um 17:40 schrieb Markus Slopianka:
On Monday 03 August 2015 16:48:24 Reindl Harald wrote:the next time you are repeating this post a link with CVE's or just refrain to repeat it - NO not a CVE for a random fork of the engine which may or may not have the same bugsAsk Red Hat why QtWebKit is not part of RHEL.
ask redhat why OpenVPN and a ton of other packages is not part of RHELthis part of your argumentation is completly broken, RHEL don't ship *a lot* packages which are in Fedora and only a part of the missing ones is available via EPEL - but to know that somebody needs to understand the differences between Fedora / RHEL / CentOS
and finally: LEAVE ME IN PEACE with the broken idea ship GTK/GNOME apps with a KDE live-image which results in BLOATWARE in case you create a live usb-stick with rw-overlayThis discussion is regarding upcoming releases. Considering that you are a troll who despises anything related to Plasma 5 anyway, this whole discussion is nothing that matters to you on any technological level. You're just participating to spread hate.
besides that despise Plasma 5 (in the current state) i do that much more for GNOME and so will have to chew it sooner or later when F21 is EOL the discussion make a GTK browser to a default for the KDE live image *matters* to me
what's your damned problem with people not agree with you?just because somebody hates the idea to pull GTK/GNOME deps into a KDE spin does not make him to a troll - just because somebody hates that the same as KDE3->KDE4 (to soon made the default in Fedora) happens again doe snot make him to a troll
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org