Am 03.08.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Mustafa Muhammad:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx <mailto:gbcox@xxxxxx>> wrote: On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Markus Slopianka <kamikazow@xxxxxx <mailto:kamikazow@xxxxxx>> wrote: Don't play dumb. No browser using a deprecated, insecure engine should ever be default. There is no excuse to do it anyway. That's why I suggested you question upstream. They are still referencing Konqueror as a key application, and it's their default browser. "If" it is their default, it doesn't need to be our default, if we let a "deprecated, insecure engine" based browser be our default, we are betraying our users.
the next time you are repeating this post a link with CVE's or just refrain to repeat it - NO not a CVE for a random fork of the engine which may or may not have the same bugs
until then try to understand that maybe one of the features you are missing that bad introduced a CVE which is not present
and finally: LEAVE ME IN PEACE with the broken idea ship GTK/GNOME apps with a KDE live-image which results in BLOATWARE in case you create a live usb-stick with rw-overlay
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
