Gerald B. Cox ha scritto: > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:luigi.toscano@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > As long as people continue spreading this information, it will continue to > exist. KDE is not a Desktop Environment, full stop, whatever you like or > think. > > > I think the point was that many people just don't care... their eyes simply > glaze over > when you get into the minutiae of it all. In any event, it's really amusing > if you do > a Google search, the first hit says: > > "KDE is a powerful graphical desktop environment for Unix workstations." > > Here is a screenshot for your amusement: https://goo.gl/photos/smu2Zem1So2pD9669 > So if you're concerned about misinformation, someone needs to work on that. Yes, Google Search. That string is only available from those pages: https://www.kde.org/announcements/beta2announce.php https://www.kde.org/announcements/beta3announce.php https://www.kde.org/announcements/beta4announce.php You can check it yourself by checking out the source of the www website and running grep there: http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/www/sites/www/ Maybe it's possible to force Google to change this information, I will ping KDE sysadmins. If you check any other page around on kde.org you will find the correct definition (the one I mentioned before). > > Interesting to notice that one side you don't care about what upstream says > about Plasma and KDE, and on the other side you want to exactly follow what > upstream ships in some of the many products. Konqueror is not part of of the > releases of the desktop anyway. > > > The thread was about changing default applications. To change a default, you need > a compelling reason. It depends on the set of default. There is no default browser for Plasma. > > > My point is: even upstream does not really want to push for a browser or > another right now. There is a (maybe just prototype) of new browser > investigated, but really really an experiment. No one in KDE community will > complain if the default browser of a "KDE-based distribution" is not > Konqueror. > > > I haven't seen anything that implies that Konqueror isn't the designated > browser for KDE; > just the opposite - there is a dearth of information on the web that implies > otherwise. It's a browser shipped with KDE Applications. Can you find anywhere that it's the default browser for Plasma? > However, > if upstream wants to clarify that, I would think they would just put out a > notice here: > https://www.kde.org/applications/internet/konqueror/ > > In any event, I still believe if one has an issue with the performance or > capabilities of a particular > application, the place to discuss that is with upstream. A browser is unfortunately a really important component of the system nowadays and even talking with upstream won't magically make it appears, even if I really would like it. Ciao -- Luigi _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org