On 24 July 2015 at 19:53, bitlord <bitlord0xff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > *Unofically* > Konqueror is officially part of KDE, "we" want what KDE provides, not > sure about rekonq now I guess there are no new releases for a long time? > Rekonq can be compared with features to konqueror + kwebkitpart > (which is default on fedora) using qtwebkit instead of khtml, so I guess > it doesn't provide much more (but possibly less without some > non-critical features), there are people here who can tell you much > more about differences. > > Firefox is not integrated well with kde, it uses GTK+ (for some parts), > it doesn't integrate with kwallet ... > > I remember I was on one of the "recent" meetings (KDE SIG) (possibly few > months ago), someone mentioned this about possible change of default > browser. >From my point of view integration with kwallet is not something I actually want, a browser that works is. This is why I'm happily using Firefox on KDE. I was *delighted* to find kwallet has integrated itself into git. Ah, wait, I mean, resigned. *resigned* to find kwallet has integrated itself into git. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
