Giuliano Colla ha scritto: > > Il 13/12/2014 22:03, Patrick O'Callaghan ha scritto: >> [...] >> For once I agree with Reindl. I don't even understand what Plasma is and >> I've been an exclusively KDE user since version 3. > > I know that you know, but in a nutshell the Plasma workspace is a bloated tray > taking all the screen, and populated with buggy applets called Plasmoids. But > if you select "Folder view" you get a Desktop where you may put what you need > (folders, files, application launchers, etc.) and get a decent KDE. But that's still Plasma. Just a different configuration. > One day KDE developers will realize that a computer Desktop must be like a > desktop where we keep the documents we're working on and the tools to operate > on them, and not third party applications. That day KDE will conquer again the > popularity it's lost with the "evolution" toward Plasma. I know a lot of > people which dropped KDE because of Plasma, I don't know anyone who switched > to KDE, fascinated by Plasma. You just said that you can get a "decent desktop". So it's a matter of configuration. Again, a different issue. We are talking about naming here and "old" people who knows the difference can help with spreading the change, instead of opposing it. Ciao -- Luigi _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
