Re: Best option for Qt5 on RHEL6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Syam Krishnan wrote:

> I've had to make only the following changes:
> 
> Comment out pkgconfig(atspi-2), pkgconfig(glesv2) and
> pkgconfig(icu-i18n) from qtbase & pkgconfig(atspi-2) from qtwebkit build
> requires.

thanks, fixed in git.

> I now have one doubt regarding pcre.
> For building qtwebkit, I had to yum install pcre-devel. When I checked
> qtbase spec file, I found that -qt-pcre is passed for fedora < 17.
> Now that qtwebkit will be using system pcre & qtbase was compiled wih
> its own pcre, will there be any issues?
> Should I edit qtbase spec file to use system pcre (although the fedora
> 17 case specifies >= 8.30 while CentOS has only 7.8) and rebuild
> everything?

qtbase really does need newer pcre (fails without it).  As for the possible 
mixture of system/bundled versions, good question, we'll have to see how/if 
it works or not.

-- rex

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org





[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux