Re: Best option for Qt5 on RHEL6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/30/2013 08:47 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
On 08/29/2013 08:48 PM, Syam Krishnan wrote:

So, please advice on my best option for Qt5/RHEL6..

Probably rebuilding the the fedora src.rpm's. May require minor tweaking wrt dependencies and such. I'd be willing to adapt things to make it work.

So far, I've successfully built qtbase, qtjsbackend, qtdeclarative. qtwebkit is being built.

I've had to make only the following changes:

Comment out pkgconfig(atspi-2), pkgconfig(glesv2) and pkgconfig(icu-i18n) from qtbase & pkgconfig(atspi-2) from qtwebkit build requires.

(of course, webkit build is still going on.. fingers crossed!)

I now have one doubt regarding pcre.
For building qtwebkit, I had to yum install pcre-devel. When I checked qtbase spec file, I found that -qt-pcre is passed for fedora < 17. Now that qtwebkit will be using system pcre & qtbase was compiled wih its own pcre, will there be any issues? Should I edit qtbase spec file to use system pcre (although the fedora 17 case specifies >= 8.30 while CentOS has only 7.8) and rebuild everything?


Thanks and regards,

Syam



_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org





[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux