Am 30.06.2011 23:57, schrieb Ryan Rix: > On Wed 29 June 2011 15:08:31 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> <rant> >> As I've said before, this whole separation of wallet functions between >> two different systems that don't talk to each other is stupid and >> counter-productive. It's as if each DE used its own version of libc. >> There's no basic technical justification for this. Each DE wants its own >> user interface? Fine, but they do essentially the same things, so why >> can't they both use a common library for keystore functionality? The >> whole purpose of a wallet is to make things easier for the user. As >> things stand, that only happens if the user stays with the apps from one >> specific DE and never uses those of the other. Does anyone out there >> actually do that? >> </rant> > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/secret-storage-spec Wanna help > fix that? ;) sounds good i hope we will see this soon active and in combination with "oxygen-gtk" and some ff/tb-themes sonner or later it will really make no difference for kde-users starting a GNOME app
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
