On Wed 29 June 2011 15:08:31 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > <rant> > As I've said before, this whole separation of wallet functions between > two different systems that don't talk to each other is stupid and > counter-productive. It's as if each DE used its own version of libc. > There's no basic technical justification for this. Each DE wants its own > user interface? Fine, but they do essentially the same things, so why > can't they both use a common library for keystore functionality? The > whole purpose of a wallet is to make things easier for the user. As > things stand, that only happens if the user stays with the apps from one > specific DE and never uses those of the other. Does anyone out there > actually do that? > </rant> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/secret-storage-spec Wanna help fix that? ;) -- Ryan Rix -- http://rix.si == OpenSource.com: Where Open Source Happens! == _ \/"/_ All Hail the Beefy Miracle! /_/ \ \
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
