Re: Thoughts on PackageKit being a hard-dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Any other opinions? ÂWhat say you?

Recommended upstream and currently works so might be good to keep it
in, although I can see how "annoying" it would be to a KDE user who
doesn't want pk on their system.

If we take it out, how will that affect end users? Do most install KDE
via Live CD or the KDE group? If so, then we could remove the hard
dep, but still include the package there. Others can remove it if they
want to, to have a pk free system.

-c
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org



[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux