Anne Wilson wrote: > On Friday 19 March 2010 15:53:41 Thomas Janssen wrote: >> 2010/3/19 Anne Wilson >> <cannewilson at googlemail.com>: >> > On Friday 19 March 2010 12:10:14 Thomas Janssen wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Neal Becker >> >> <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> > Thomas Janssen wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Neal Becker >> >> >> <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >>> OK, second time I tried to report a bug. It's not me. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> After putting a sentence explaining what I was doing before the >> >> >>> crash, I get a dialog asking if I can tell some more. I choose >> >> >>> no. >> >> >>> Then my only choice is quit of save the information - not send it >> >> >>> in. And, if I pick save, and then I see it means save to a file, >> >> >>> and I cancel, the whole thing just quits. This is exactly what >> >> >>> happened the last time. Really frustrating that I spent all the >> >> >>> effort to download debuginfo, check dups, and it was a complete >> >> >>> waste of time. >> >> >> >> >> >> Means the information given wasn't enough for a good bugreport. The >> >> >> first sentence is kinda a header telling the general problem. The >> >> >> second (you said no) is where to give more information/telling what >> >> >> you did. Without that information (tell some more) it's not a >> >> >> useful bugreport. The behavior changed lately. Sending old style >> >> >> bugreports, without further information isn't possible any more >> >> >> AFAIK. >> >> > >> >> > It should warn the user that if they say 'no, they can't give more >> >> > info' that it will close without sending the report! >> >> >> >> Agreed. >> > >> > Last time I saw it, it actually said if the bug report itself wasn't >> > useful, and offered to download debug packages to improve matters. >> > That >> > was only a couple of days ago. Are you saying this isn't so any more? >> >> That's still the same. We spoke about "additional information" or "can >> you tell what you did as it crashed". Forgot the exact wording. > > But if it says it is not good enough, and you can't give any more > information, > what else do you want it to do? I see no point in additional 'warnings' - > the point is already made when it said that it is not useful. > > Anne No, I strongly disagree. I gave some info. I have done these reports before. It used to be that if you only gave a short description, it asked if you could give more info, and if you said no, it would continue the report. Now it just quits without warning.
