On Friday 19 March 2010 12:10:14 Thomas Janssen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thomas Janssen wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> OK, second time I tried to report a bug. It's not me. > >>> > >>> After putting a sentence explaining what I was doing before the crash, > >>> I get a dialog asking if I can tell some more. I choose no. Then my > >>> only choice is quit of save the information - not send it in. And, if > >>> I pick save, and then I see it means save to a file, and I cancel, the > >>> whole thing just quits. This is exactly what happened the last time. > >>> Really frustrating that I spent all the effort to download debuginfo, > >>> check dups, and it was a complete waste of time. > >> > >> Means the information given wasn't enough for a good bugreport. The > >> first sentence is kinda a header telling the general problem. The > >> second (you said no) is where to give more information/telling what > >> you did. Without that information (tell some more) it's not a useful > >> bugreport. The behavior changed lately. Sending old style bugreports, > >> without further information isn't possible any more AFAIK. > > > > It should warn the user that if they say 'no, they can't give more info' > > that it will close without sending the report! > > Agreed. Last time I saw it, it actually said if the bug report itself wasn't useful, and offered to download debug packages to improve matters. That was only a couple of days ago. Are you saying this isn't so any more? Anne -- KDE Community Working Group New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100319/37de01e7/attachment.bin
