RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:58:37 +0100
References: <hn31d6$19a$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <hn6m1i$qg4$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201003100724.05747.eli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201003101007.16126.jamatos@xxxxxxxx> <20100310160930.15037hb6gis40aai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <hn970v$51m$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e2c721b1003102258w3e6916ady542e2d6b0e042977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thomas Janssen wrote:
> I'm curious since i heard it a few times now from you. Who recommends
> it as the default rendering engine?

The Konqueror developers. In fact, many of them are also KHTML developers.

        Kevin Kofler

References:
- RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
  - From: Rex Dieter
- RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
  - From: Eli Wapniarski
- RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
  - From: José Matos
- RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
  - From: Eli Wapniarski
- RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
  - From: Thomas Janssen

Prev by Date: RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
Next by Date: RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
Previous by thread: RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
Next by thread: RFC: kde stability proposal (redux)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KDE Users] [Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Mail] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Fedora Triage] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux