So essentially what this means is that Konqueror becomes less and less relevant. A real shame. Eli On Wednesday 10 March 2010 17:31:10 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Wednesday 10 March 2010 15:09:30 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > Quoting Jos? Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt>: > > > On Wednesday 10 March 2010 05:24:05 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > >> And its usually up to everyone else to do what needs to be done to get > > >> their browser to work otherwise people can't use it, even if they > > >> want to. Konqueror is capable of using webkit as its main rendering > > >> engine. Chrome uses webkit. Chrome works, KDE based aps don't. Hell > > >> their are times when I've tried to access pages on KDE's site and > > >> have seen Konqueror crash. > > > > > > FWIW one of the reasons given for chrome to use a separate process for > > > each tab was that if flash crashes then the browser will not be taken > > > with. > > > > > > So the idea that flash crashes in other browsers other than > > > konqueror is not a > > > new one. :-) > > > > Perhaps not, but it still doesn't take anything away from the fact > > that under Chrome / Webkit the browser does not crash when I try to > > view flash videos in CNN and other sites; under Konqueror / Webkit it > > does. They're both Webkit. So..... huh ?????? > > It's not WebKit as WebKit... Konqueror uses QtWebKit and lot of stuff is > different to Chrome WebKit. Especially handling of non native ns plugins > like Flash. > > Jaroslav > > > Eli -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
