On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> wrote: > On Monday 08 March 2010 21:46:38 Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote: >> > One more call for discussion around another proposal that came out of >> > FUDCon Toronto. ?Short version of this is that we'd consider slowing >> > down updates a step, esp for the second half of a fedora release's >> > lifetime, and to limit kde 4.x-type upgrades to at most 1 per release. >> > >> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Stability_Proposal >> > >> > >> > Whatever we decide, increasing our transparency by documenting our update >> > practices will hopefully help shape everyone''s plans and expectations. >> > ?As it is, seems these vary wildly. >> >> What will that mean for people like myself looking for little bug >> fixes? > > Great opportunity for junior developers to backport/fix small issues ;-) So then this may actually involve more work? I like Fedora's fast pace (though recently slowing) nature. I'd be happy to endorse this if it meant less work for the KDE team. -- Fedora 11 (www.pembo13.com)
