On Thursday 18 February 2010 19:08:45 Tim Wunder (Lists) wrote: > On 02/18/2010 12:59 PM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Thursday 18 February 2010 15:54:39 Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Anne Wilson wrote: > >>> The old lists will not be migrated in a workable fashion, as the > >>> mechanism is not the same. > >> > >> Ugh, that is really broken! The last time the distribution list > >> mechanism changed, they provided a migration tool to do the conversion. > >> But this time they even HAVE a migration tool (the Akonadi migration > >> tool) and didn't make it convert things properly? This kind of > >> disregard to user data (and configuration is data) really needs to stop > >> (it's not the first time a KDE app just ignores configuration from > >> older versions, unfortunately). > > > > No data is lost. Additional functionality will come as soon as possible. > > You can still filter entries, of course, since I would assume that all > > contacts in a ML will have common data somewhere. > > I'm confused. You say 'no data is lost' right after telling Neal he has > to rebuild his distribution list. Doesn't a distribution list count as > data? > All his records are still there. All he's lost is one method of using it. And it has been replaced by another method,. No, he has lost no data. His records are the data. Anne -- KDE Community Working Group New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100218/62c6589e/attachment-0001.bin
