On Thursday 31 December 2009 15:23:44 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > did you try to watch the processes with the "System Monitor"? in the > Process Table select on the listbox "All processes, Tree", and you may > guess who to blame. In my case, akonadi-control owns several > sub-processes, none of them consume much CPU nor memory (same is valid for > Nepomuk - this has been a huge improvement), look at the pic in > http://arielch.fedorapeople.org/images/sysload_akonadi_nepomuk.png > I wouldn't blame Akonadi, so may be it's a Kontact thing. > Maybe it is. Yes, I've been trying to find the culprit in ksysguard. As you say, the individual akonadi processes don't seem to use too much, the MySQL daemon is using much more, and kontact was using around 45% cpu, whereas since I made the change I mention in my last mail it has dropped to 5% or less. I assume that it's the interaction, of trying to do something that's impossible, that has caused the problem. It's still too early, though, to say whether I've cured it. > By the way, what's your Akonadi set up? I've found the embedded mysql to > consume more resources than the server, so I changed the default set-up to > use a MySQL server running on localhost, but this may not be the case for > you... Anyway, this you try with a whole brand new clean .kde user > directory? After some crashes, I've found this to be the better solution. > Embedded mysql - out-of-the-box from kde-fedora. I don't have a stand-alone mysql server to use. I've always thought that it would be relatively difficult to set up. The only time I tried it, the instructions didn't work. Anne -- KDE Community Working Group New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20091231/f33aaca8/attachment.bin
