PulseAudio in-/output device confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> > Is this the optimal ordering for PulseAudio for each of
> > in-/output?
> 
> It's OK for output. You can ignore input at this time, Phonon doesn't
>  really support capturing yet.

So, I've set for capturing - my hardware uses the Intel alsa sound driver - 
HDA-Intel (AD 198x analog) which is working fine.

Martin Kho

P.S. I'm always using the test button to see if a setting works and I never 
see no if I get the question that a setting is not needed/used ... We're not 
on Windows are we :-)

> 
> > And why does output have both PulseAudio
> > and PulseAudio Sound Server (is one a vestigial
> > rudiment of an earlier release)?
> 
> The "PulseAudio Sound Server" entry is the ALSA pulse device. The entry
> called just "PulseAudio" is native PulseAudio (so it's preferred).
> 
> A future release of Phonon will no longer show all those ALSA devices when
> PulseAudio is in use, but instead offer a list of devices which can be
> accessed through PulseAudio. But this is work in progress (by Colin
> Guthrie).
> 
>         Kevin Kofler
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fedora-kde mailing list
> fedora-kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
> 



[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux