On Sunday 06 September 2009 13:26:21 Anne Wilson wrote: > On Sunday 06 September 2009 13:07:38 Sonic wrote: > > On 09/06/2009 05:31 PM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > Nepomuk's tagging is not the same as amarok's tagging :-) It collects > > > information about your files and their contents and collates and stores > > > information about them in order for strigi to work. > > > > > > Strigi then indexes the files, based on the information that nepomuk > > > has gathered. It's this combination of the two that will give us very > > > fast access to all files relating to a search-term. For most of us > > > it's not fully functional yet. > > > > Oh,, thanks for clearing that up. This changes my whole picture of > > Nepomuk-Strigi relationship. This means Nepomuk is compulsory for Strigi > > to work. > > I'm sure that what I said is an over-simplification, but it's the general > idea > We have a new userbase page - http://http://userbase.kde.org/Nepomukuserbase.kde.org/Nepomuk which really explains things. You'll see that my understanding of the subject was only partially correct, so we'll learn together :-) Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090907/eb82ada2/attachment.bin
