On Sunday 06 September 2009 13:07:38 Sonic wrote: > On 09/06/2009 05:31 PM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > Nepomuk's tagging is not the same as amarok's tagging :-) It collects > > information about your files and their contents and collates and stores > > information about them in order for strigi to work. > > > > Strigi then indexes the files, based on the information that nepomuk has > > gathered. It's this combination of the two that will give us very fast > > access to all files relating to a search-term. For most of us it's not > > fully functional yet. > > Oh,, thanks for clearing that up. This changes my whole picture of > Nepomuk-Strigi relationship. This means Nepomuk is compulsory for Strigi > to work. > I'm sure that what I said is an over-simplification, but it's the general idea :-) Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090906/d919d1bb/attachment.bin
