On Monday 27 July 2009 18:50:16 g wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > It seems that now you have to mark a key as 'Ultimately Trusted' before > > you can encrypt with it. > > > > This feels totally wrong to me, but there's nothing I can do about it. > > i agree. but i guess that is one of pleasures of authoring a program, you > have the right to change what you want when you want, even if it is just > to keep users on their toes. :) > I could always raise a bug report, but when it comes down to it, I'm finding it hard to express why I think that I'm right and they're wrong. I just feel that Ultimate should be reserved for your own key and ones that you have properly verified. Yes, I've seen the argument that the passports I checked could have been forged, but they had been inspected by immigration, so I'm not going to worry about that :-) > glad you got it worked out. now you can sleep even better tonight. I hate mysteries. Even when it's something that doesn't stop me working, it really does bug me until I've sorted it. :-) Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090727/90e24e40/attachment.bin
